Higher caste college students protested towards the supply, arguing that it was one-sided and that within the title of stopping discrimination, it might really encourage “reverse bias” towards college students.
Higher caste and common class college students declare that the brand new guidelines are simple to abuse. They level out that fairness committees constituted by heads of establishments to stop discrimination embrace solely representatives from reserved classes.
They argue that the code doesn’t specify satisfactory safeguards towards false or malicious complaints. Some college students and school have warned that the rules might encourage a tradition of surveillance on campuses.
Amid rising criticism, a number of Bharatiya Janata Social gathering leaders have argued that the transfer will backfire and additional isolate society’s higher castes from the occasion.
“Such choices have already been taken by the federal government, which has been very essential of it.” savarna (higher caste) and now this may have an effect on our kids, the youthful technology. We’re introducing these provisions at a time when the very guidelines of reservation are being questioned. That is fully unacceptable,” mentioned a senior Bharatiya Janata Social gathering official from Uttar Pradesh.
The restrictions have additionally been criticized by the Karni Sena, a Rajput group, which says the restrictions have been introduced in to suppress Muslims. savarna society. The Karni Sena threatened to launch large-scale protests if the restrictions weren’t lifted.
“The occasion’s numbers got here all the way down to 240 (within the 2024 LS polls). And the conclusion drawn was that it was as a result of the SC and ST communities didn’t help the BJP. If this (UGC norm) is just not withdrawn, the occasion must face the results,” the UP BJP chief mentioned.
Additionally learn: What’s the stand of JD(U), the one NDA ally to query the Centre’s draft guidelines on appointment of college VCs?
letter to prime minister
some native B.B.T. Leaders have expressed anger on the transfer. resigned occasion publish. Shyam Sundar Tripathi, president of the Bharatiya Janata Social gathering’s Kisan Morcha in Saron (Rae Bareli) constituency, has written a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and resigned from his occasion publish.
“I resigned from my publish as an indication of protest. Though I’m nonetheless a number one member of the occasion, of guidelines What has been launched is totally unjust and towards the overall class of scholars,” Tripathi, who joined the Bharatiya Janata Social gathering in 2019, informed ThePrint.
In a letter to the chief minister on January 25, Tripathi mentioned he was resigning attributable to “black legal guidelines” just like the UGC guidelines introduced “towards higher caste youngsters”.
“this regulation It is extremely dangerous and divisive to society. I am fully towards that. I can’t help such unethical habits guidelines “As a result of they’re fully at odds with my shallowness and beliefs,” he added.
Social gathering leaders say many higher caste leaders really feel that the occasion is taking them with no consideration.
“The occasion’s numbers have come all the way down to 240. And the conclusion drawn was that it’s as a result of the SC and ST communities are usually not supporting the BJP. They’ve give you scheme after scheme for his or her welfare and now we have remained silent. However now, that is about the way forward for our kids and this transfer is totally discriminatory. If this isn’t withdrawn, the occasion must face the results,” mentioned a senior BJP chief.
“They underestimate the unity of the higher castes. In the event that they unite, nobody will be capable of stand towards us. The occasion must introspect,” he added.
Devendra Pratap Singh, senior member of the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Meeting, additionally expressed severe opposition to UGC rules. Singh wrote a letter to the UGC on January 22, warning that the measures might “destroy social concord and intensify caste conflicts” throughout the nation.
He referred to as on the UGC to rethink the framework. Singh mentioned the rules, as framed, might upset the steadiness of society and widen caste-based divisions. He confused that equity is critical however should not undermine social cohesion or alienate some college students.
“The choice by the College Grants Fee (UGC) will destroy social concord and enhance caste tensions within the society. This may create deep rifts within the society and destroy the training setting in universities and better training establishments. This regulation could be very more likely to be misused,” Singh wrote within the letter. He informed ThePrint that thus far he has solely communicated with UGC.
“The rules you’ve got made can be a strong weapon to suppress the overall class. Goals of College Grants Fee (UGC) 2026.” (Guidelines) Oppression of Dalit and backward class college students ought to be prevented and common class college students shouldn’t be made insecure,” he added.
In line with media stories, one other BJP chief from Uttar Pradesh’s Balrampur, Mrigendra Upadhyay, additionally resigned, calling the UGC norms anti-Brahminical and opposite to widespread classes.
With Prime Minister Modi, it’s attainable. Belief us, all of the misconceptions about UGC notifications can be eliminated. In line with Articles 14 and 15 of the Structure, there is no such thing as a distinction between Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Lessons and Common Lessons. 10% reservation for common class solely, Prime Minister Mode solely…
— Dr. Nishkant Dubey (@nishkant_dubey) January 25, 2026
Involved concerning the criticism the occasion is dealing with from inside in addition to from exterior, BJP MP and senior occasion official Nishikant Dubey sought to deal with the problem. He mentioned that so long as Prime Minister Narendra Modi is there, no hurt will come to the overall class of youngsters.
“Mr. Modi characteron turning into Chief Minister, secured Supreme Courtroom recognition and 10 per cent reservation for higher caste communities – that is the reality,” he posted on January 24.
Upholding Article 14 of the Structure drafted by Babasaheb Ambedkar is consistent with the core spirit of the Structure and can’t be tampered with, he mentioned. “Do not be fooled by deceptive claims. Underneath the Modi authorities.” characterWith Prime Minister Modi’s management, there can be no discrimination within the Bharatiya Janata Social gathering authorities – that is his assure, even to a easy employee like me. ”
Dubey reiterated this level in a number of posts about X, questioning the “misunderstanding.” Underneath development. “Relaxation assured, the UGC guidelines are equally relevant not solely to common classes but in addition to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Lessons. This isn’t politics. This nation is run on the idea of the Babasaheb Ambedkar Structure.” character”
“It is attainable as a result of now we have PM Modi.. All misconceptions relating to UGC notifications can be cleared up. “In line with Articles 14 and 15 of the Structure, there is no such thing as a distinction between Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Lessons and Common Classes,” he wrote in Sunday’s X.
“After the implementation of the Mandal Fee in 1990, all political events within the nation shaped governments, however solely Mr. Modi gave justice.” character. Please wait. Misconceptions relating to UGC will even be cleared,” mentioned BJP chief Nishikant Dubey.
Nevertheless, many individuals identified in his publish that in keeping with the rules, caste-based discrimination refers to discrimination primarily based on caste or tribe towards members of SC, ST and OBC communities.
Dubey claimed that the ten per cent reservation within the common class was granted solely due to Prime Minister Modi. “After the Mandal Fee got here into drive in 1990, all political events within the nation shaped governments, however Mr. Modi was the one one who delivered justice.” character. Simply wait – the misconceptions about UGC will finish finally,” he added.
Forward of the Uttar Pradesh meeting elections scheduled for early 2027, many leaders really feel the problem might have political dimensions.
“Discrimination in functions”
Senior Congress chief and occasion common secretary Jitendra Singh Alwal criticized the federal government over the transfer.
“Discrimination on the idea of faith, caste, gender and background is unacceptable not solely in academic establishments/universities/schools but in addition in civilized society. The ‘Promotion of Fairness in Larger Instructional Establishments Guidelines, 2026’ applied by the UGC seems to be an try to divide college students from one another and switch them into enemies,” he posted on X.
He alleged that the brand new UGC tips spotlight the central authorities’s anti-student intentions to focus on and mislead college students whereas aiming to dismantle academic establishments.
Discrimination on the idea of faith, caste, gender and background has no place in any academic establishment/college/school or in any civilized society.
The “Promotion of Fairness in Larger Instructional Establishments Laws, 2026” applied by the UGC goals to divide college students amongst themselves.
— Jitendra Singh Alwar (@JitendraSAlwar) January 26, 2026
Former Uttar Pradesh Congress chief Ajay Kumar Lal mentioned, “The Modi authorities believes that with the assistance of those guidelines, it may possibly show itself as a champion of social justice and win the belief of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and different backward lessons. After struggling a crushing defeat within the Lok Sabha elections in Uttar Pradesh, Modi considers this his masterpiece.”
Amongst different opposition events, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi additionally expressed sturdy opposition to the rules.
“Any type of caste-based discrimination on campus is mistaken, and lots of college students in India are already struggling its dire penalties. However should not the regulation be inclusive and assure safety to all? Why such discrimination within the utility of the regulation?” she posted on X.
She additional questioned the absence of safeguards towards abuse of those rules and what occurs within the case of falsehoods. Submitting.
“How ought to guilt be judged? How ought to discrimination be outlined, whether or not by phrases, actions or perceptions? The method of implementing the regulation have to be clear, correct and honest for all. Subsequently, quite than making a adverse ambiance on campus, we urge the UGC discover to be withdrawn or amended as acceptable.”
(Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)
Additionally learn:Heart units up skilled committee to evaluation draft UGC curriculum amid issues over ‘severe flaws’
