New Delhi: Because the race for the Vice President’s put up started to warmth up, the BJP was former Supreme Courtroom Choose Choose (RETD) B of India Bloc. He launched a scathing assault on Sudashan Reddy, compromising nationwide safety, supporting Naxal’s rebel and accusing them of sympathy for anti-state parts.
Choose Reddy, who served as a Supreme Courtroom choose till his retirement in 2011, has been topic to harsh BJP criticism even earlier than he and NDA candidate CP Radha Krishnan formally launched the marketing campaign for the September ninth presidential election.
In a collection of statements and social media posts, the BJP senior chief highlighted the previous judgments and actions of Justice Reddy, who claims to undermine India’s nationwide pursuits.
In Caustic X Submit, BJP nationwide spokesman Pradeep Bhandari mentioned the selection of “India Liance” vp has uncovered its hypocrisy and chapter “nonetheless once more.”
“Congress despatched B. Sudershan Reddy as a candidate for Vice President, a person who’s undermined by harmful judgment, anti-state sympathy and shameless opportunism,” he mentioned. “Parliament itself was as soon as fired as yes-man and as we speak paraded as heroes.”
“As a choose of the SC, he defeated Salwa Yudham – crippled the combat in opposition to Naxal in Peak’s Maoist violence, petitioned for exports to Israel in opposition to Indian arms exports – undermined India’s international partnership. The Congress and NCP black flagged his appointment of Lokayutah and branded him in 2025.
Bhandari talked about Congress’ criticism of the NDA authorities for nomination of Justice (RETD) Ranjan Gogoi as Raja Sabha after changing into India’s forty sixth Chief Justice.
“They attacked Choose Gogoi by becoming a member of RS, however they positioned their very own retired judges for the VP. This election isn’t just a candidate, however does one of the best workplace in India replicate the nation’s resolve or the filthy compromise of the Congress on nationwide safety!” Bhandari mentioned.
The BJP additionally nurtured the position of Justice (RETD) Woman in Bhopal Gasoline tragedy lawsuits. In 2011, as a part of the bench of the five-judicial Supreme Courtroom, led by then-Choose Sh Kapadia, Choose Reddy rejected the CBI therapeutic petition, looking for a retrial and harsher punishment in opposition to union carbide executives.
The petition got here after public outrage over the beneficiant two-year sentence filed in 2010 to seven former Union Carbide staff.
The bench determined that the CBI didn’t present a compelling clarification to renew the case. The BJP has persistently accused former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and subsequent Arjun Singh Union Automotive Construct Warren Anderson’s Chairman and CEO Escape from India 1984.
In one other criticism, the BJP chief famous that Justice Reddy signed the petition final yr together with 24 different distinguished personalities, urging the Ministry of Protection to halt arms exports to Israel in the course of the Gaza battle.
Former Supreme Courtroom Choose B. Sudarshan Reddy remembers the choice that it’s now advocated by the Vice President’s Workplace India Liance and undermines India’s combat in opposition to Naxalism.
On July 5, 2011, Choose Woman handed out a verdict in Yudum case in Salwa – … https://t.co/ti7o9rokxg
-Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) August 19, 2025
BJP IT Celchief and West Bengal’s in cost Amit Malviya criticized him within the 2011 verdict within the Nandini Sundar vs Chhattisgarh lawsuit. The ruling defeated the state’s coverage of arming tribal youths as particular cops (SPOs) underneath the Salwa Judam motion, declaring them unconstitutional.
“The ruling was led by Professor Nandini Sundar at Delhi College, and was put in a petition in proximity to the Naxal group and appointed (later dropped) in Buster’s homicide FIR (she can be the spouse of Sidas Varadarajan. He mentioned in a put up on X.
“When Prime Minister Narendra Modi repeatedly known as for the dismantling of the roots and branches of Naxalism, the Indy Alliance selected to boost candidates to hold siding contamination together with these whose legacy has enabled the rebel,” he mentioned.
“This contest will not be merely about filling the constitutional put up, it is about whether or not India’s greatest workplace displays the spirit of the state’s resolve in opposition to violent extremism or recurs with compromises from previous ideologies,” he mentioned.
Learn once more: In India, a block choice for VP candidates, a bid to unleash an “ideological battle” put NDA allies on the spot
Previous BJP women praised
Regardless of the present assaults, the BJP beforehand praised Choose Woman for his groundbreaking 2011 ruling on Black Cash. Earlier than his retirement, the bench led by Justice Woman and Justice (RETD)SS Nijjar lifted the UPA authorities as a result of it confirmed no seriousness in retrieving black cash saved in abroad financial institution accounts. They ordered the formation of a particular investigation staff (SIT).
BJP spokesman Prakash Javadekar later known as it a “slap within the face of the UPA authorities” and mentioned the court docket had uncovered the parliament-led centre harassing in opposition to corruption.
“We welcome the Supreme Courtroom’s choice to nominate them to the problem of black cash. This choice has fully uncovered the federal government and Congress. The federal government doesn’t need to take strict and sincere steps to verify corruption and black cash. This choice is a slap within the face of the federal government,” he mentioned.
“The choice is proof that even the courts don’t belief the federal government’s intentions in addressing corruption,” he mentioned.
Earlier than the decision got here, BJP chief Lk Advani, who made Black Cash a central difficulty within the 2009 Lok Sabha marketing campaign, wrote a weblog that claims that the topcoat “hopes that the apex court docket will minimize Black Cash by forcing the federal government to amass enduring apex courts by forcing the federal government to revive this wealth.”
“The nation expects the Supreme Courtroom to pursue this difficulty logically. USD 462 billion is a large quantity that may result in miraculous perverts within the Indian state,” Advani refers back to the recommendation of the apex court docket to not reveal the names of individuals lined in cash, and is a large quantity that may result in excessive perverts.
The Black Cash petition was submitted by Ramjes Malani and others. Upon listening to the incident, Justices Reddy and Nijjar informed Legal professional Common Gopal Subramanium, “What’s the problem of revealing info? What privilege is it that they insist that they don’t disclose details about individuals who have deposited their cash in overseas banks?”
Narendra Modi, the BJP prime minister candidate, efficiently accomplished the 2014 Lok Sabah vote marketing campaign on black cash and corruption points. After taking up as Prime Minister, Modi constituted to sit down in Black Cash as the primary choice of the Cupboard
“There have been makes an attempt to avoid wasting somebody, the rationale UPA did not represent SIT,” PM later tells Rajya Sabha.
He was appointed Lokayukta by Goa Govt
Amidst the nationwide anti-corruption sentiment in the direction of the UPA authorities, supported by consultations on the alleged coal fraud, 2G fraud and the Anna Hazare motion, BJP-controlled Goa, led by Prime Minister Manohar Parikar, appointed Choose B. Sudashan Reddy in March 2013 because the state’s first lokayutah.
Nonetheless, when Choose Woman was sworn in as Gore Locayukuta, the opposition MLA reportedly remained absent. They didn’t formally boycott the ceremony, however the opposition accused Justice Woman of being a “sure man” in Parikar.
In 2010, after the Supreme Courtroom’s Board of Inquiry and Rajya Sabha appointed a panel that features Justice Reddy, a perpetual movement was moved in opposition to Calcutta Excessive Courtroom Choose Sumitra Sen, and concluded that Choose Sen had dedicated “fraud” and needs to be held liable.
The BJP supported each the committee’s findings and the perforated movement.
Through the debate on the movement in 2011, opposition chief Arun Jaitley mentioned in Raja Sabha:
“The choose is like Caesar’s spouse. He should exceed doubt. Caesar divorced his spouse merely on suspicion. Those that occupy a excessive workplace should stay by way of scrutiny of the best odds.
(Edited by Ajet Tiwari)
Learn once more: Tamil Nadu’s Ajatshatru, rose from RSS – why the CP Radhakrishnan’s face and the BJP banks him
